Digg Cheater
Maximum bid: $2000
I need a piece of software that does the following:
Can generate any number of Gmail accounts (specified by the user), from 1-150. In order to do that, the software has to be able to run through a list of proxies (which should be easy to import). The software will pick the first proxy, generate random info for the account, BREAK THE CAPTCHA, and successfully register an account. It will then log out, sign into the next proxy, generate another account, log out, repeat. Until the specified number of accounts has been made.
After that, the user can move onto the next project in the software, where it uses those generated Gmail accounts (stored into a dated database-type file) to go and register accounts with Digg.com. It will have to generate a random name from a list of keywords/numbers, give fake info, use one of the email addresses generated, hit submit, log into Gmail, click the activation link, then log out of gmail and digg, and move to the next proxy, and repeat, until all accounts are made.
After the accounts have been generated, you user submit a story to digg (outside of the software), get the URL for the story, and have the software log into Digg with one of the accounts it generated, "Digg" the story, and log out. Then after a number of minutes (specified by the user, between 5-30 mins), it will pick a new proxy, log in with a new account, Digg the story, and log out. Until it has gone through every generated account.
Thursday, February 14, 2008
Thursday, February 7, 2008
What would you do if the British government banned alcohol?
38 answers. Best Answer:
Other Funny Answers
1. Emigrate.
2. start selling it illegally and gown filthy rich!!
3. brew my own booze using old fruit and marmite
4. I would stop paying my taxes!
5. If it did happen, which it won't it would have disastorous effects for the British Economy.
With the amount of tax they put on booze they would have a huge hole to fill and all of our taxes, even those that don't drink much, would be heavily increased in different ways.
A black booze market would be created and criminals would be making a lot of profit and the booze would be unregulated and possibly contaminated.
The funds that these criminals gain from this new illegal booze trade would provide them with more funds for other activities like drugs and prostitution.
Alternatively people would make their own booze and become criminals because of something they have been doing all of their lives. People who enjoy the occasional tipple would be deprived of this because of the minority troublemakers.
What would I do? Emmigrate.
6. Build a still.. :)
7. They never would. Just like they wouldn't band the sales of cigarettes. They want the duty money.
8. swim to france
source: answers.yahoo.com
it would never happen, they have far too mush to loose in inflated tax and duty....
anyway, we'd all just go on booze cruises to the Continent!!
Other Funny Answers
1. Emigrate.
2. start selling it illegally and gown filthy rich!!
3. brew my own booze using old fruit and marmite
4. I would stop paying my taxes!
5. If it did happen, which it won't it would have disastorous effects for the British Economy.
With the amount of tax they put on booze they would have a huge hole to fill and all of our taxes, even those that don't drink much, would be heavily increased in different ways.
A black booze market would be created and criminals would be making a lot of profit and the booze would be unregulated and possibly contaminated.
The funds that these criminals gain from this new illegal booze trade would provide them with more funds for other activities like drugs and prostitution.
Alternatively people would make their own booze and become criminals because of something they have been doing all of their lives. People who enjoy the occasional tipple would be deprived of this because of the minority troublemakers.
What would I do? Emmigrate.
6. Build a still.. :)
7. They never would. Just like they wouldn't band the sales of cigarettes. They want the duty money.
8. swim to france
source: answers.yahoo.com
Wednesday, February 6, 2008
Teacher assignment: go investigate internet porn
A teacher gives an assignement to high school freshmen to research porn on the internet. After some parents complain, the superintendent says oops, and the assignment is pulled.
From the Breitbart article: "Superintendent Jeff Lampert said that although the teacher's apparent goal 'to discuss the harmful effects of pornography' was well- intentioned, he agreed with parents that the assignment was inappropriate for 14- and 15-year-old freshmen at Brooklyn High."
Does the superintendent think the assignment would have been OK for juniors or seniors? The superintendent should have said this was wrong, period.
For part of the assignment the students were asked to write about any experience they had with internet porn. The teacher has no business asking students about their personal lives! This is so inappropriate.
The superintendent claimed the assignement was well-intentioned and didn't expect the teacher would be disciplined. Well most of the time when the rest of us do something wrong there are consequences. If the police pull over a man speeding, he normally doesn't get off if he claims his intentions were good. Should teachers not have any consequences when they make a serious mistake?
Superintendent Lampert went on to say: "At this point, I don't see that as an issue, the whole purpose was to discuss a societal ill."
It seems like he doesn't understand how big a deal this is to so many parents. A mature adult is in a much better position to make decisions about sex, drugs, and so on. But most 14 and 15 teenagers are don't have the wisdom to make decisions about porn.
Scott Gioia, the teacher, said he was trying to teach the students the ills of internet porn. Maybe next week he will try to teach students the problems with alcohol and suggest they check out five different bars in town, and sample one drink at each bar.
This is a health class. There are all sorts of reasonable health issues for the teacher to review. He can talk about good foods to eat, the importance of exercise, and to stay away from drugs.
Scott has been teaching for about five years. Maybe he has given this assignment before, and before no parents find out about it. Another reason to homeschool, to make sure your children aren't given destructive assignments.
From the Breitbart article: "Superintendent Jeff Lampert said that although the teacher's apparent goal 'to discuss the harmful effects of pornography' was well- intentioned, he agreed with parents that the assignment was inappropriate for 14- and 15-year-old freshmen at Brooklyn High."
Does the superintendent think the assignment would have been OK for juniors or seniors? The superintendent should have said this was wrong, period.
For part of the assignment the students were asked to write about any experience they had with internet porn. The teacher has no business asking students about their personal lives! This is so inappropriate.
The superintendent claimed the assignement was well-intentioned and didn't expect the teacher would be disciplined. Well most of the time when the rest of us do something wrong there are consequences. If the police pull over a man speeding, he normally doesn't get off if he claims his intentions were good. Should teachers not have any consequences when they make a serious mistake?
Superintendent Lampert went on to say: "At this point, I don't see that as an issue, the whole purpose was to discuss a societal ill."
It seems like he doesn't understand how big a deal this is to so many parents. A mature adult is in a much better position to make decisions about sex, drugs, and so on. But most 14 and 15 teenagers are don't have the wisdom to make decisions about porn.
Scott Gioia, the teacher, said he was trying to teach the students the ills of internet porn. Maybe next week he will try to teach students the problems with alcohol and suggest they check out five different bars in town, and sample one drink at each bar.
This is a health class. There are all sorts of reasonable health issues for the teacher to review. He can talk about good foods to eat, the importance of exercise, and to stay away from drugs.
Scott has been teaching for about five years. Maybe he has given this assignment before, and before no parents find out about it. Another reason to homeschool, to make sure your children aren't given destructive assignments.
Tuesday, February 5, 2008
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)